Wednesday, April 27, 2011

More Fraudulent, Antagonistic And Absolutely Meritless Lawsuits From Leah Krier

I really can't determine if Leah has become profoundly naive, evil . . . or both -- either way, it certainly is profound.  This is because she went ahead with some her obviously bogus claims in a rural court in Barton County Kansas with absolutely NO jurisdictional authority in this matter.  See the below email along with attachment (and hyper-links) motions to finally end this nonsense.

If there wasn't so God-damn much corruption, this legal ruse would have never seen the light of day . . . it seems as though our entire legal system is in turmoil, and incapable of rendering a fair decision based on legal due process, as it was meant to be by our forefathers.

To:  Judge Ron Svaty
        Court Clerk Judy Burnette
        Leah Krier
       Jane Isern

I am unable to attend today's hearing, which Jane Isern scheduled without my prior approval and on a matter that is entirely meritless and in a court which has no jurisdictional authority whatsoever.  She also proceeded with this hearing even though she knew my wife of 24 years had just died and was buried on Monday afternoon in New York. Click here for her obituary -- click here for a video tribute

In my opinion, Jane Isern is a woefully incompetent and unethical attorney who MUST be disbarred to protect the general public, and the claims she's brought are instances of harassment and entirely frivolous.  I further believe Jane is a miserable excuse for a human being and a cantankerous shrew with the IQ of a cucumber.

This matter MUST be dismissed NOW and FOREVER, and the attached document together with its hyper-linked supporting documents should ensure this to be the case . . . if NOT, then we are also contending with a similarly corrupt judge. I demand that you stop this madness NOW!

P.S. to Leah:  You have no idea how profoundly disappointed I am in you . . . for you have devolved into a pathological liar with no class and no moral values . . .  you are a disgrace to Jackson and to your entire family.


JACKSON S. YOUNG by and through
his next of friend and natural mother,
 LEAH R. KRIER           

Case No. 2010 – DM – 399


Now again comes the Respondent (Spencer C. Young), acting in a pro se capacity, who requests the District Court of Barton County, Kansas (hereinafter, the “Court”) to:
ØDismiss Petitioner’s (Leah R. Krier’s) Motion for Default Judgment for Custody and Support (Exhibit A), filed on her behalf by her attorney, Jane Isern of Brown, Isern & Carpenter;
ØDismiss Petitioner’s Paternity Petition (Exhibit B )
ØRescind Petitioner’s Ex Parte Order, which Respondent has NEVER seen, and is aware that it exists only from a ROA docket ENTRY on this case (Exhibit C); and
ØDismiss or otherwise rescind any and all other filings or orders made or otherwise caused by Petitioner against Respondent in Barton County, Kansas.
In Support
Motion for dismissal is hereby made because of the following relevant facts:
(1)  Lack of Jurisdictional Authority – This Court has no jurisdiction whatsoever over ANY of the parties in this case, nor does it have any jurisdictional authority concerning ANY aspect of this case – ergo, the Paternity Petition is null and void;
(2)  The Respondent Timely Filed an Answer – Although the Paternity Petition was null and void Respondent did in fact timely file an Answer to the meritless claims of the Petitioner;
(3)  Ethics Violations by Petitioner’s Attorney – Petitioner’s counsel has violated the Rules of Professional Conduc(Exhibit D) promulgated by the Kansas Judicial Branch by engaging in unethical behavior in this matter toward both Petitioner and Respondent.
(4)  Paternity Has Not Been Proven – Due to Petitioner’s well-documented promiscuous sexual behavior with men other than the Respondent during the conception period of her son serious questions remain as to whether Respondent is the natural father, and Petitioner has taken no cooperative action to prove this to be the case
(5)  Claims are Meritless – Even if Respondent was the natural father, the Petitioner has no valid claims whatsoever, as she has been prepaid child support for the next five years

Lack of Jurisdictional Authority
This Court has no jurisdiction whatsoever over ANY of the parties in this case, nor does it have any jurisdictional authority concerning ANY aspect of this case. 
The Petitioner has a long established and current residency in the state of North Carolina, along with her son, Jackson, who was born in Durham, NC in 2008, and has lived with his mother since then, while regularly attending pre-school on full-time daily basis at a day care center located in Durham, NC.
Moreover the Respondent has never had any resident association with the State of Kansas, and while it remains unclear whether Respondent is the biological father of Jackson due to Petitioner’s well-documented promiscuous past, (pages 9 thru 13 of Exhibit E), it is an absolute certainty that Jackson was not conceived in the state of Kansas.
The Petitioner’s residency in the state of North Carolina is evidenced by the Petitioner’s: (1) valid North Carolina driver’s license; (2) voter’s registration and history of voting in the state of North Carolina; (3) registration of her 1999 red Mercury Mystique automobile with the North Carolina Dept. of Motor Vehicles, and (4) her employment by Air Wisconsin, whose duties are carried out on behalf of, and as agent for, U.S. Airways, where she has long been based out of U.S Air’s Raleigh-Durham (NC) airport hub.   Importantly, these irrefutable facts are readily corroborated by the North Carolina Dept. of Motor Vehicles (919-715-7000), the North Carolina State Board of Elections (919-733-7173) and Joel Kuplack, Vice President of Human Resources at Air Wisconsin (920-739-5123).
Furthermore, an unqualified representation of North Carolina residency was attested to by the Petitioner, which was observed and confirmed first hand in a late night visit to the Petitioner’s North Carolina residence by the Durham (NC) Police.  Officers Tyler and Silla were dispatched pursuant to the directions of Durham Police Captain Ray Taylor to conduct a criminal investigation of alleged grand larceny theft by Petitioner, as well as an investigation into the welfare of the subject child in the Paternity Petition.  These findings of fact are contained in the Durham Police Criminal Incident Report # 11-007695, and other related findings (Refer to Exhibit F)
Moreover, on April 11, 2011, it was confirmed by an independent third-party that Petitioner’s son has attended a pre-school (Deborah’s Day Care, located in Durham, NC) on a full-time basis for the past five months, and has also resided in an apartment located in Durham for a considerably longer time period than that.  This can be confirmed with “Deborah”, the owner of Deborah’s Day Care, who can be reached at 919-596-3636. (Refer to Exhibit G)
Therefore based on the aforesaid reasons and irrefutable evidence, the District Court of Barton County Kansas has no jurisdiction over this matter nor any of the parties

Timely Answer Filed by Respondent
In a subsequent communiqué, Petitioner’s attorney confirmed Respondent’s Answer was timely filed, and Petitioner’s attorney admitted to having committed fraud. (Refer to Exhibit H)

Ethics Violations & Malpractice by Petitioner’s Attorney
Based on highly unethical and incompetent behavior by Petitioner’s attorney, ethics violations have been filed against Petitioner’s attorney, seeking disbarment. (Refer to Exhibit I)

Paternity Has Not Been Proven
Although given the opportunity to submit to the Respondent the requisite buccal swab samples of DNA for the Petitioner and her son, the Petitioner has not complied.

Petitioner’s Claims Are Meritless
Respondent’s Answer of Exhibit E clearly show the Petitioner’s claims are meritless, as Petitioner has been pre-paid child support for the next five years, presuming Respondent is in fact proven to be the natural father.  Moreover, Petitioner owes Respondent $78,000 +
Petitioner’s motions for dismissal of all claims should granted and all associated filings or orders against Respondent in Barton County, KS should be rescinded.

Respectfully submitted,
Spencer C. Young

List of Exhibits:
A – Motion for Default Judgment for Custody and Support
B – Paternity Petition
C – ROA Docket Entries
D – Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct For Attorneys
E – Respondent’s March 2 Answer (The Aftermath)
F – Durham Police Report
G – Unjustified Panic at Deborah’s Day Care
H – Recent Emails exchanged with Petitioner’s attorney
I -  Ethics Violations Complaint Filed

Monday, April 25, 2011

Beautiful Maria Of My Soul

The below video was produced as a tribute to Maria with the few pictures I have of her, along with many TV broadcast clips of our son Ryan playing collegiate lacrosse for the University of Maryland, where her valiant battle with pancreatic cancer had been often discussed by the sports announcers at CBS, FOX and ESPN.  Accordingly, she has become well-known to many in these national broadcasts, which helped raise awareness for pancreatic cancer and the search for a cure and prevention of this exceptionally deadly disease.

Maria had no history of cancer in her family, she didn't smoke, and didn't drink except for an occasional glass of wine.  Without question, her cancer was brought about by the overwhelming and unrelenting stress of MorganStanleyGate.  It is an empirically-documented medical fact that chronic stress can substantially lower one's auto-immune system, which serves as the primary defense against cancer.

P.S.:  You'll be interested in understanding why I have so few pictures of my wife of 24 years.  Paragon Commercial Bank was part of the negotiations of our divorce settlement agreement (again, the stress of MorganStanleyGate ended our marriage), and had agreed to finance its key provisions; however, shortly after the agreement was inked, Paragon treacherously reneged (pursuant to directives received from Morgan Stanley).  In response, Maria withheld two decades of family pictures I was to receive copies of.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Carnac's Answer: 2.2 million; Ellis & Winters; and Morgan Stanley

"Carnac the Magnificent" . . . .
. . . was a character created by Johnny Carson, who was frequently featured on the Tonite Show during his tenure as its renowned talk show host.  In it, he played a psychic adorning an elaborately decorated turban, who clairvoyantly divined the answer to what was typically a three-part question contained in a sealed envelope.  The skits were usually hilarious; however, in the context of today's answers, such is not the case.

The three part question to the above answer is as follows: What is the current annual hit rate to Spencer C. Young's websites?;  Who was the most prolific individual visitor to Mr. Young's websites this month?; and What is the common 'thread' to it all?  Now let's explain each of these answers.

2.2 Million

Mr. Young operates a dozen websites, many of which have only recently been completed and some are still very much in development -- click here for a complete listing and explanation of each.
Three of these are social networking websites and are therefore feeders to his nine other "content" websites.  Many of these "content" websites have experienced explosive growth.  For instance, April's "content"-only website hits are projected to be at least 185,000, which equates to a 2.2 million annual hit rate

More importantly, based on average monthly growth realized over the past five months (note: monthly growth rates have been increasing), the annual hit rates are conservatively projected to reach . . .

. . .178 million by year- end.

Ellis & Winters

For the month-to-date (as of the date of this posting) for April 2011, the most prolific visitor to Mr. Young's websites is a law firm with offices in Raleigh and Greensboro, NC.  Mr. Young has had no prior involvement with this firm whatsoever, which begs the question, why would this law firm have visited Mr. Young's websites 998 times over a three week period?  The answer lies in their client listing on their website, particularly the bank listed at the bottom right - "Paragon Commercial Bank" (see below), because Paragon is a small local bank facing a bank foreclosure fraud claim that could very well end its days as a going concern because of the implicit involvement and tacit endorsement by its senior management AND Board of Directors.

The next question would be why wouldn't Poyner & Spruill be monitoring Mr. Young's websites? After all, this is the law firm who represented Paragon in its fraudulent foreclosure proceedings against Mr. Young and many of his North Carolina properties.   Answer:  Paragon is aware that Poyner & Spruill will be named as co-defendant in the impending bank foreclosure fraud lawsuit.

Morgan Stanley

Remember, MorganStanleyGate is all about money.  And what began as a relatively pedestrian Wall St. employment fraud evolved into a range of unsavory actions to initially protect the IQ® franchise Mr. Young had created and later engagement in increasingly unlawful activities, with the intent to cover up the growing number and seriousness of misdeeds, by:

  • Destroying Spencer Young's career, marriage, family and livelihood;
  • Obstructing justice and denying all rights to legal due process;
  • Sabotaging, stealing or otherwise depleting Mr. Young of his assets;
  • Smearing Mr. Young's personal character and professional reputation;
  • Discrediting Mr. Young's mounting claims; and eventually planning on
  • Silencing Mr. Young.

And let's not forget the transgressions of MorganStanleyGate effectively tortured and killed Maria Young, Mr. Young's wife of 24 years, which makes Morgan Stanley a firm of torturous murderers.

So how is this all connected?  Refer to the below schematic, but recognize this is simplifying something quite involved, but certainly helpful in understanding what's really been going on.

John Mack, Bob Steel and Bob Hatley were born and raised in North Carolina, and were the CEOs of Morgan Stanley, Wachovia and Paragon at the time the fraudulent bank foreclosures were carried out against Spencer Young's investment properties in North Carolina.  The 'good ole boy' network is alive and well in North Carolina, particularly among bankers, attorneys and public officials, most particularly in the Triangle region -- this is also why it is likely the most corrupt region in the United States.  

Messrs. Mack and Steel are close friends, alumni of Duke and both served on Duke's Board of Trustees when the fraudulent foreclosures took place.  There have also been long standing institutional ties between Morgan Stanley and Wachovia (well before Mr. Steel became its CEO) and virtually EVERY executive at Paragon Commercial Bank had an extensive prior banking career at Wachovia.

At the behest of Morgan Stanley, Wachovia carried out the fraudulent foreclosure of The Courtyard of Chapel Hill, and Paragon carried out the fraudulent foreclosures on Mr. Young's other investment properties (e.g., The Pit Stop of Durham, Meadowmont Village Condo of Chapel Hill and land parcels to be used for valet parking at The Courtyard of Chapel Hill).

And MorganStanleyGate gets resolved once the bank foreclosure fraud claims against Paragon and Poyner & Spruill are filed and the resultant criminal investigations are commenced . . . it's really that simple.

By the way, do you think there is any link between Morgan Stanley's attorneys (Kirkland & ELLIS) and Paragon's attorneys (ELLIS & Winters)? Hmmm.

Friday, April 22, 2011

John Mack - Hypocrite & Murderer

The below email was sent to John Mack, upon his return to Morgan Stanley as its new CEO (note: he has since retired, but remains Chairman of Morgan Stanley's Board of Directors).  The request to meet to resolve the referenced employment fraud was not only rebuffed, actions against Spencer Young were substantially stepped up.

Over time, John Mack proved himself to be a profound hypocrite, and an exceptionally evil man, and the information Mr. Young now possesses on Mr. Mack's subsequent wrongdoings is enough to send Mack to prison, which is why such outlandish efforts were later made to silence Mr. Young.

Importantly, had Mr. Mack taken 15 minutes to meet with Mr. Young, the MorganStanleyGate matter would have been resolved back in 2005, Maria Young would still be alive today, their family would be very much close and loving, as it had always been.  

Instead, Mack directed an increase in an unending series of unlawful and malicious acts against Mr. Young, which created unimaginable chronic stress over many years, and eventually taking a lethal physical toll on Maria Young, thereby killing her.

Subject: Congratulations // Parallels To Your Experience With Phil Purcell . . . As Well As With The Ron Perelman Matter // Request For A Meeting
Date: 7/5/2005, 1:42 AM
From:"Spencer C. Young" <>
To:John Mack <>
Organization:Spencer C. Young Investments, Inc.

John –

Congratulations on your appointment to CEO of Morgan Stanley -- a position originally promised to you as quid pro quo for the instrumental role you played in the merger of Morgan Stanley and Dean Witter. I'm sure Dick Fisher is smiling and quietly applauding from above. With hind sight, perhaps your only regret is that you trusted Phil Purcell to be a man of his word. As I have told my three sons, "the cream always rises to the top" -- ergo, bravo for your perseverance in proving this so.

I bring to your attention a matter of somewhat similar circumstances, also having parallels with the Ron Perelman matter.  Specifically, I have been a victim of an egregious breach of contract and Machiavellian scheme carried out by Warren Friend and John Westerfield of Morgan Stanley. Through fraudulent internal misrepresentations and hectoring, I was terminated after having created and trademarked the most successful proprietary brand of CMBS on Wall Street, to wit, “IQ®, representing Institutional Quality”. Specifically, my professional ethics were blasphemed and my personal integrity was defamed. Moreover, legitimate efforts for re-employment have been tortiously interfered with by Morgan Stanley, perhaps because group heads at firms such as AXA, Aegon, GMAC, Apollo, JPMorgan and Union Central Life had agreed to work for me in a new, competing endeavor, called Project Atlas. I was so vexed by what Warren Friend and John Westerfield perpetrated, that I wrote an epigrammatic poem as a cathartic release, which has been published by three periodicals, including one by Mensa, an intellectual society at which I am a lifetime member. I have attached this document, which includes translations and explanations directly related to this matter -- I merely changed or omitted names in the interest of proper decorum and discretion.

Morgan Stanley refused to enter into any settlement negotiations, so I was left with no alternative but to file a claim with the NASD for $10 million plus damages – and I am contemplating increasing this amount because of additional damages realized from delay tactics and failure to produce discovery information, similar to the unsavory legal tactics recently revealed in the $1.45 billion judgment granted to Ron Perelman.

This ordeal has taken an enormous toll on me and my family. Specifically, Morgan Stanley's invidious actions have caused a tremendous financial and emotional strain, and has forced me to seek business opportunities outside of New York. By pure serendipity, I found such opportunities as a result of my son Michael's matriculation at Duke University, where he recently completed his freshman year, and played for their #2 ranked lacrosse team. Although I have had to spend most of my time
in Durham and Chapel Hill away from my wife and other two sons in New York (who are also being recruited to play lacrosse for Duke), I had the opportunity to see most of Michael's lacrosse games and became well acquainted with Head Coach Mike Pressler. I have also established a strong relationships with Smedes York, the CEO of York Properties and a two term former Mayor of Raleigh, and Aaron Nelson, the Executive Director of the Chapel Hill/Carrboro Chamber of Commerce.

I would like to arrange a face-to-face meeting with you, as I believe you and I would be able to gain quick resolution to this matter -- you will likely recognize me from conversations we had during your original tenure at Morgan Stanley. By way of background, I joined Morgan Stanley in 1997 to jump start originations in Real Estate Debt Capital Markets, and did so by making sweeping operational changes. Accordingly, commercial mortgage originations increased 5 fold (to $2.5 billion) in
less than two years. I also established CreditSource® Commercial, utilizing the Dean Witter retail brokers to market commercial mortgage financing. Prior to that, I launched the CMBS principal transaction business at JPMorgan, and in so doing, became well acquainted with Dick Fisher's brother, David.

I have a similar regret -- to wit, having trusted Warren Friend and John Westerfield. Simply stated, I'm looking to: (1) clear my sullied name and reputation, (2) receive fair recompense; and (3) be given a legitimate opportunity to demonstrate that I am also the "crème de la crème".


Spencer C. Young

Countermand of Valor by Spencer Young -- As Published by Mensa - Nov-Dec 2004.pdf (292KB)

Email From Maria - The Day After Thanksgiving 2006

One can NOT emphasize enough how dangerously evil Morgan Stanley is as an institution, and the below email from Maria provides additional context to this reality.  She wrote it the day after Thanksgiving in 2006, a traditional family event that Mr. Young was not part of for the first time.

Morgan Stanley MUST be exposed and brought to justice.  This firm should have NEVER been bailed out by the U.S. government with taxpayer money -- they should have been allowed to fail because this firm epitomizes the complete failure of humanity -- for their unbridled greed drives them to literally destroy other peoples lives.  Click here to access how they do this, along with three other examples of such diabolical efforts, where they were caught red-handed, and paid a price.  Unfortunately, they NEVER changed their malevolent ways -- they merely became more adept at covering it up.

Maria and Spencer Young had as strong a marriage as there could be, and there was no father who was closer to his sons than Mr. Young.  Yet Morgan Stanley destroyed it all -- and how they went about doing it should scare EVERY  U.S. citizen.

Morgan Stanley MURDERED Maria Young -- Morgan Stanley MURDERED the Young Family -- Morgan Stanley MURDERED Mr. Young's career and livelihood.  And although Mr. Young cannot bring Maria back to life, nor un-do the torture she was subjected to for over 8 years, leading to her death on April 17th, he CAN and WILL bring back to life everything else that Morgan Stanley MURDERED, and by doing so, allow Maria's legacy of love to live on.

-------------Original Message----------------
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 8:39 PM
Subject: (no subject)

I hardly thought I'd ever be writing this letter but life certainly surprises us all at times. Spencer, we've been through much together...many beautiful, fun and happy times and of late many painful times. We've both handled the past four years badly on many levels. In spite of the good things that we both believe we have done...and there have been many...we have not banned together through this time and we have both allowed our marriage and our family to splinter and break and I am writing this to let you know that I am not going to allow that to happen.

Yesterday was the worst day ever for me...and it made me realize that I need for you to be a part of this family. You are loved dearly and you are a vital part of whom "The Young's" are....I want to regroup and to come together and rebuild our lives. The boys love their family deeply and they want us to be as we were...a loving family.

After reading and reflecting on your emails to the boys and I, I have come to realize that I have completely under appreciated the toll that Morgan Stanley's wrongful acts have taken on you. I know that you are pursuing what you think is right and importantly that you are doing it not only for yourself and your professional reputation but for your family. You have always worked so hard and what they did was wrong..I have always believed that. I realize now that you feel (and rightfully so in many cases) that you have been betrayed and I never intended for you to feel that I am betraying and abandoning you as well. What I have wanted so very badly is to return to a normal life, life before Morgan Stanley's horrible actions, life when we were a happy family with time together as a family - all of us together. It is in this vein that at so many times I just wish we could put the Morgan Stanley case behind us and move on. I guess it is wishful thinking and not the way the real world works...but again to allow this horrible firm to trash not only a career that was thriving and where you were so successful, but to also allow this to destroy our family...that would be the worst tragedy of all. You are right to remember our vows of "for better or worse" and unfortunately in life many times adversity can bring out the worst in a couple's relationship and in our case I believe that is what happened. But it is not too late and we should not allow the tentacles of Morgan Stanley to reach further into our life and inflict more harm than they already have. I know you have a big battle ahead and realize now the adversity you have had to deal with in pursuit of what is for you a quest of righteousness. Let's try to come together to bring our family back to what it once was...I know we cannot turn the clock back but we can start to craft a new beginning and be a family matter what. 

Thursday, April 21, 2011

. . . . .WANTED: DEAD or ALIVE. . . . .

For The Relentless Torture &
Eventual Murder of
Maria Antoinette Young

Morgan Stanley (with the diabolical assistance of Kirkland & Ellis) MURDERED Maria Young, but not until they rendered her destitute and tortured her in every way, shape and form for 8 ½ years . . . and their motivation was unadulterated GREED.
Through the unrelenting stress from their malicious acts, they destroyed her marriage of 24 years, brought about complete dysfunction within her family, and kicked her out of her from home in Manhasset in a fraudulent foreclosure orchestrated by Morgan Stanley through the systematic destruction of her husband’s career, while unlawfully obstructing justice so his mounting claims were NEVER adjudicated.  The resultant chronic stress sufficiently lowered Maria’s immune system such that she contracted an especially lethal form of cancer, despite the fact that there was no incidence of this or any other form of cancer in her family history.
Morgan Stanley executed their reprehensible actions in order to protect the highly successful “IQ” CMBS franchise her husband had created.  This franchise was worth $250 million when he completed its development in 2002, and considerably more thereafter.
Morgan Stanley evicted Maria Young from her home in 2008 when she was convalescing from extensive cancer surgery that removed her pancreas, gall bladder, and half her stomach.  They also evicted her three sons from the only home they knew.  They then orchestrated the cutting off of funding for her chemotherapy and radiation treatments through what may be the worst instance of bank foreclosure fraud in U.S History, which was carried out on her husband’s investment properties in North Carolina.
This incorrigibly evil firm MUST be brought to Justice.  

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Fraudulent Domestic Violence Complaint & Order Was NOT DISMISSED ?!?

The essence of MorganStanleyGate at this point is the employment of widespread fraud and corruption in increasingly desperate efforts to cover-up extensive criminal activities.  These are all surreptitiously sponsored by Morgan Stanley and Kirkland & Ellis, and continue to implicate an ever-growing and truly astonishing number of prominent bankers, attorneys and public officials in what very well may be the most corruption-laden region in the United States -- to wit, the Triangle region, which is located in central North Carolina and vectored by Raleigh, Durham and Chapel Hill.

Motion to Dismiss & Hold Mr. Young's Fiancee' in Contempt
The motion below was filed in response to an entirely bogus claim of domestic violence filed by Mr. Young's fiancee' (Leah Krier), pursuant to the guidance and assistance provided by the Durham Police Dept, which she admitted to him in her April 9 phone call to him.  The notion of Mr. Young ever committing domestic violence is preposterous, but more importantly, he has been between 600 and 1,000 miles away from his fiancee and toddler son for over 14 months, thereby rendering such an event a physical impossibility.

The Durham Keystone Cops
The Domestic Violence complaint and requested Order was filed on March 11, 2011, and it was denied as it was obviously baseless.  However, a modified complaint was prepared sometime during the first week in April and back-dated to March 17 at the request of the Durham Police Dept. in order to justify their withholding of  information in the criminal investigation ordered by Mr. Young.  But the Durham Keystone Cops screwed up their dates in that the investigation was carried out on March 14.  

What this means is this:  The Durham Police were obligated to divulge ALL of their findings in their investigation, and wrongfully failed to do so.  This is yet another instance of corruption in an ever-growing  cover-up.  But why?  As the saying goes, where there is smoke, there is fire.  Sadly, they have duped Leah Krier into playing a complicit role by feeding her complete lies and threatening her if she does not cooperate.

The Dire Implications of Being Duped
Mr. Young's wife of 24 years was similarly duped into undertaking baseless pernicious actions against Mr. Young, which only resulted in her complete economic destitution and overwhelming chronic stress, which  ended up completely destroying her life and eventually killing her.  You would have thought Leah would have learned from Maria's mistakes.  Notwithstanding, Mr. Young forgives Maria and Leah for their terrible errors in judgment, and hopes Leah recognizes this before she too loses her health from the resultant stress of MorganStanleyGate.  

Mr. Young wants Leah to understand he will NOT pursue full custody of Jackson nor seek her being found in contempt for fraud and obstruction of justice, if she withdraws her fraudulent legal claims in BOTH Kansas AND North Carolina.

Widespread Corruption is Obvious At This Point
This entirely fraudulent Domestic Violence Complaint and Order should have been dismissed on April 18th, but Mr. Young can get no feedback on the hearing, other than being told it was NOT dismissed -- this is yet another instance of corruption. 

Motions Filed by Mr. Young
Reproduced below are the actual motions filed by Mr. Young with appropriate hyperlinks to corroborating evidence.


                Durham         County
u  File No.  11 CVD 2280  
In the General Court of Justice
District Court Division
Name of Plaintiff

MotionS for
Name of Defendant

Note:  Defendant is unable to attend the April 18, 2011 hearing at 2:00 pm, as he is several hundred miles out of state.  In addition to being faxed, these motions are being emailed to Judge Labarre at, as the hyperlinks throughout this document reference information that is not faxable (videos, pictures and unique html websites), and are directly responsive to Plaintiff’s allegations.

Now comes the Defendant, Spencer C. Young, acting in a pro se capacity, who requests the District Court of Durham County, North Carolina (hereinafter, the “Court”) to dismiss, cancel and expunge Plaintiff’s (Leah R. Krier’s) EX PARTE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORDER OF PROTECTION as modified, filed and ordered on March 17, 2011, together with any and all associated documents submitted by Plaintiff in support of this order and associated COMPLAINT. 
Motion is further made to find Plaintiff in contempt for fraud, and obstruction of justice.
In Support
The aforesaid motions are hereby made because of the following relevant facts:
  1. Perjury – With few exceptions, NOTHING represented as fact by the Plaintiff is true, as memorialized in the Plaintiff’s  COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROTECTIVE ORDER filed on March 11, 2011;
  2. Fraud – The EX PARTE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORDER OF PROTECTION, as modified, filed and ordered on March 17, 2011 is predicated on entirely false statements or otherwise gross misrepresentations intended to defraud the Court and deny Plaintiff his right to legal due process; and
  3. Obstruction of Justice – Upon information and belief, Plaintiff was advised by officials of the Durham Police Dept. to submit the knowingly fraudulent claims in order to support their withholding of information associated with their findings in a criminal investigation conducted on March 14, 2011, which was subjected to inexplicable delays, and was the result of a complaint originally filed on Feb. 28, 2011 alleging grand larceny theft and child endangerment.
  4. Credibility – Moreover, the relative comparison of character, background, accomplishments and display of moral values by observed actions of the Plaintiff and Defendant accord substantially more weight to the facts presented herein; thereby making the case to dismiss and hold the Plaintiff in contempt especially compelling
Plaintiff’s COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROTECTIVE ORDER filed on March 11, 2011 contains bombastic lies and gross misrepresentations intended to maliciously smear the personal character of the Defendant.  The instances of Plaintiff having perjured herself are summarized in the table below.
Plaintiff’s Lies
The Truth
(1)“[Defendant] has continued to harass me for the past year”
False.  It is the other way around, and this fraudulent complaint is one such example.
 Defendant has asked to Plaintiff to return the belongings stolen, and not do anything disruptive to his pursuit of justice in the MorganStanleyGate scandal.  Plaintiff has been prepaid for child support for the next five years, even though questions remain as to whether Defendant is the natural father to Jackson, so there is no reason to file Paternity Petition at this point.  Click here for details.
Plaintiff stole Mercedes Benz, HD TV, Sound system and valuable paintings, and failed to repay a loan of about $20,000.  Criminal investigation ensued, and Plaintiff used this Order to withhold information as to the whereabouts of these items and information about the safety & welfare of son Jackson. For more, click here.  
(2)“[Defendant] has posted video’s and pictures all over the internet threatening me naked pictures.”
[Note Plaintiff’s grammatical errors]
False. Defendant has pictures of ALL of his loved ones on his Facebook page, which are available ONLY to his Facebook friends, JUST LIKE MILLIONS OF other people do all the time.  Defendant owns ALL the pictures and NONE of them are “naked pictures”.  Plaintiff wouldn’t know this, because she has rebuffed all “friend” invitations from Defendant, and therefore unable to access these pictures. 
The videos Defendant has produced himself, and celebrate ALL of his loved ones and are of exceptional professional quality, very tasteful and in some instances address the impact the MorganStanleyGate scandal has had on ALL of Defendant’s loved ones, including Plaintiff, whom Defendant still loves despite her atrocious behavior toward him. 
Defendant owns the referenced pictures and solely produced, and therefore owns the videos.   Again this is something literally millions of others do, and there is nothing remotely harassing about them.  To access all such videos, please visit The Forever Young Channel on

Plaintiff’s Lies
The Truth
(3) “Defendant is mentally ill and I am afraid for mine and my child’s life.”
[Note Plaintiff’s poor grammar]
False and patently absurd.  This is a baseless, vicious and knowingly false statement, which the Plaintiff admitted to in a conversation on April 9 in a call she placed to Defendant.  The Defendant is certainly not mentally ill, which can be verified by Dr. Alan Manevitz, a renowned Psychiatrist based in New York, who has treated Mr. Young for a mild form of ADHD.  It is obviously mild, as evidenced by his having graduated from Cornell with honors and with a Masters degree, with no treatment whatsoever.
Notwithstanding, the Plaintiff continues to suffer the symptoms of a nervous breakdown, which first manifested after the wrongful eviction stemming from what may be the  worst bank foreclosure fraud in U.S. history
(4) “I receive no child support and I am the sole caregiver”
False and false. As evidenced in Defendant’s letter of March 2, which also served as his answer to Plaintiff’s fraudulent Paternity Petition in Kansas, Plaintiff has been prepaid for the next five years, and legitimate questions remain as to whether the Defendant is the true father, the evidence of which is also detailed in that letter.
It is impossible for Plaintiff to be the “sole caregiver” because she travels for a week or more at a time.  Defendant has offered to care for Jackson, but Plaintiff has always rebuffed while exhibiting entirely bizarre behavior
(5) Defendant has posted my child’s name and pictures all over the internet.
Misrepresentation.  This is represented as though Defendant had circulated pictures in a manner intended to harm to his little son, or otherwise put him at risk – nothing could be further from the truth.  Defendant has effectively the same pictures of Jackson posted on his Facebook page, as Plaintiff does.   The answer to (2) also applies here, and Plaintiff seems to forget Jackson is Defendant’s son also, and he is certainly not the first proud father who wanted to show some tasteful pictures of his son.
(6) Defendant even [has} my child’s picture, begging for money
False.  Here is an instance of either intentional deceit, poor reading comprehension or just laziness on the part of the Plaintiff.  The Web page she is referring to has not changed for many, many months.  Click here to view the page she’s referring to and click on the link that says “if you like to help click here” – you  will get redirected to a social networking mobilization model developed by MIT to quickly identify and engage targeted resources to resolve the many elements that comprise the MorganStanleyGate scandal.  If she bothered to read it, it is an opportunity for the Defendant to pay others . . . NOT the other way around, ergo no one is begging for money. 
(7) Defendant has threatened to take my son from me.
Misrepresentation.  Defendant has only said he would lawfully seek full custody of Jackson – and only if Plaintiff continues on her reckless path.  Any parent foolhardy enough to kidnap their child in a custody dispute would only end up losing any rights to see the child.  Defendant does NOT engage in such unlawful / irrational activities.
(8) I’m afraid [Defendant] could kidnap or hurt Jackson to get to me.
Baseless and Insulting.  Plaintiff admitted to lying here In her April 9 phone call to Defendant.  It appears she was coached/instructed to say this.  Defendant is quite different from Plaintiff in that he harbors no ill-feelings toward her, nor wishes her any harm, and has often expressed his unconditional love for her, despite all of the vicious things she’s done to him.  The notion of harming a child to ”get to” someone is repulsive, and it is disturbing that Plaintiff could ever think that way.

Plaintiff’s Lies
The Truth
(9) Jackson should not be close to him due to his mental state
False and patently absurd.  Refer to answer to LIE # (3)
(10) “Defendant was trying to buy one at one time”
Misrepresentation.  Defendant has never owned a gun, and has no intentions of owning one. Plaintiff’s father has a large arsenal of guns and actually purchased lethal shotguns for his grandson’s for their first Christmas, and Defendant admonished Plaintiff and her father for their reckless instance of woefully poor judgment.
(11) “Defendant says I’m trying to make him kill himself by abandoning him”
Equivocation.  Defendant has reminded Plaintiff that her behavior has been so atrocious throughout the aftermath of the fraudulent bank foreclosures, he couldn’t script a more pernicious response for her.  To construe this as a suicide threat is reflective of a person with a low IQ – enough said.
(12)  “I want mine and my son’s things out of storage that he will not return.”

[Note again Plaintiff’s poor grammar]
Bold Faced Lie.  Defendant has no belongings of Plaintiff in any storage facility.  The day after the wrongful eviction occurred, Plaintiff secretly arranged to segregate and pick up all of her belongings and those of Jackson, and moved in with another man.  A small bin of old clothes and some bric-a-brac was placed in a bin; however, when Plaintiff failed to pick this up, it was thrown out, as promised.  Notwithstanding, if Plaintiff believes there are things she may have inadvertently left behind, she should itemize them and send to Defendant for review.  If those things she lists are hers, and Plaintiff is willing to pay the cost of opening up the storage crates as well as the cost of my attorney to supervise AND she returns the Mercedes Benz, the Sony HDTV, the Dolby surround sound system and the paintings she’s stolen, then Defendant is willing to accommodate her request.  NOTE:  the instructions in the EX PARTE ORDER must NOT be executed, for they were made with erroneous information

Fraud & Denial of Due Process

Erroneous Findings & Conclusions
Defendant’s Response
(1) In the Past Year Defendant placed the Plaintiff in fear of imminent serious bodily injury and in fear of continued harassment
Bold Faced LieThis was denied on Mar. 11.  What additional evidence was provided on Mar. 17? It would have to be fabricated  As mentioned in the answer to Lie # (1), it is the Plaintiff who is harassing the Defendant
(2) Defendant constantly emails plaintiff even though Plaintiff changed emails several times.
False.  Firstly, Plaintiff has NEVER changed her email address – it is and always has been – she sent me an email from that address on April 9, and it’s the ONLY email address she’s ever had.  Secondly, Defendant only emails in response to an attack from the Plaintiff. 

Erroneous Findings & Conclusions
Defendant’s Response
(3) Defendant had to be tased by Sheriff deputies
Couldn’t be more false.  Refer to for the truth to what happened.  Legal claims are in process of being brought against those officers involved.
(4) Defendant was later admitted to a mental facility.
False., reveals the truth.  Upon failing in their other sinister plans, an attempt was made to institutionalize Defendant against his will in exactly the same manner as depicted in the movie Changling, starring Angelina Jolie.  Mr. Young outsmarted them and was able to quickly obtain release from yet another vicious fraud.
(5) Defendant made threats to commit suicide
Bold Faced Lie.  Refer to answer to Lie # (11) above.

Obstruction of Justice
Refer to all blog entries located at:
. . . for numerous instances of irregularities, corruption and cover-up carried out the Durham Police Dept., which is why so many police resources were involved in an otherwise pedestrian matter.

In weighing the facts presented and considering the veracity of statements made by the Plaintiff and Defendant, it is helpful to consider their respective backgrounds from the standpoint of education, career, community service, achievements, moral values, etc.
One of America’s founding fathers, Thomas Paine said “Lead, follow or get out of the way”, aptly summarizing three alternative courses of action to consider when confronted with an issue.  As noted in the below comparison, it is obvious the Defendant is a natural leader and the Plaintiff is someone who has no leadership inclinations whatsoever, and those she has chosen to follow of recent demonstrates exceptionally poor judgment, which in effect has made her actions obtrusive and disruptive to the common good.
Ivy League educated graduating with honors with an MBA in Finance and Bachelor of Science in Hotel Administration from Cornell University.  Taught several courses as Professor’s teaching assistant in the areas of Management, Engineering & Property Management, Communication Arts & Public Speaking. For more, go to
Graduated from Great Bend High School with a “C” average. Briefly attended Barton Community College, but dropped out after first semester.
Relationship Stability
Was married for 24 years.  See
Never married, and is best described as a promiscuous serial dater, who typically shacks up with a different man every few months.  Her longest uninterrupted relationship was with Defendant, whom she was engaged to (almost 3 years).  Proudly recounts an affair with a married man, who was a close friend of and same age as her father.
Enjoyed a distinguished and highly successful career in corporate finance, real estate and banking, spanning over two decades, working in executive roles at Dun & Bradstreet, Citicorp, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley.   Highly successful real estate investor for two decades. has more.
After dropping out of community college, worked in a rural bar as a barmaid. Later became a flight attendant for Air Wisconsin
Earnings & Net Worth
Prior to being the target of the worst bank foreclosure fraud in U.S history, Defendant had  earned a seven-figure income for many years and had accumulated an eight-figure net worth, which he intends to reclaim.
Defendant has seldom, if ever, made more than $25,000 per year, and her net worth is certainly less than that.

Community Service
Served as the Commissioner of Basketball for the town of Manhasset Catholic Youth Organization & Police Athletic League; Coached numerous grade school teams in baseball, basketball, soccer & lacrosse. See
Philosophy /Moral Values
Defendant’s philosophy and moral values are articulated in great detail at two different websites:  The entire website at “” features musings on achieving lasting happiness through self-actualization, and reviews his philosophical foundation
Plaintiff’s philosophy is “If it feels good, do it” and her actions over the past 15 months suggest she may possess no moral values or guiding principles to speak of.
Founded the Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (“CMBS”) business at JPMorgan, and created the IQ® franchise at Morgan Stanley, valued at $250 million when initially developed and considerably more thereafter. 
Was employee of the week.
His website located at reviews the importance of truth and intetgrity, He also has a website called, an acronym for Magna Est Veritas Ety Praevalbit (or “truth is mighty and shall prevail).
A profound & prolific liar as noted herein
Raising Children
Defendant has three adult sons from his marriage: Michael graduated with honors from Duke in 2008, and played lacrosse all four years. His team went to the Final Four in 3 of the 4 years.  He works as a Trader at Lazard in London. Kevin is an honors student at Duke and also on the Duke Men’s lacrosse team. Kevin’s team has made it to the final four all three years and they won the NCAA Championship in 2010.  Ryan attends Univ. of Maryland and is an All-American in lacrosse.  He is the team captain, and highly respected for his leadership skills. Upon graduation Kevin will follow Michael’s footsteps in investment banking and Ryan was drafted to play professional lacrosse, an up and coming sport.
No prior experience, and only serves as a part-time mother as she often travels for a week or more at a time, often handing off the care of her toddler to a rag-tag team of family members, friends and acquaintances

Extra-curricular Activities
Was a Gridiron 44 All-star running back on Long Island in high school, (a distinction held by many NFL players) and played varsity football for Cornell, starting as a sophomore under legendary Super Bowl head coach George Siefert.  Has often taught Dale Carnegie Course on Human Relations and Public Speaking
Hang out at bars.
Foreign languages (French, Italian, German and Spanish); Guitar (electric & acoustic); and computer applications and software; Has studied/practiced martial arts for over two decades, with a focus on Tae kwon do, Shotokan Karate and Kyusho-jitsu
Cognitive Abilities
IQ measured in top 1%, a member of Intertel, and lifetime member of Mensa.
Although Defendant sees a way to dramatically improve upon this, Plaintiff currently possesses a below-average IQ
Plaintiff’s EX PARTE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORDER OF PROTECTION as modified, should be dismissed, cancelled and expunged, together with any and all documents associated with this Fraud-induced order.
Plaintiff should be held in contempt for fraud, and obstruction of justice, and ordered to return all belongings of Defendant

Respectfully submitted,
Spencer C. Young