Sunday, September 9, 2012

Info On Filing complaints Against Judges and Attorneys In North Carolina

            How can I take action against an attorney who has acted improperly or unethically?
Contact the North Carolina State Bar. The State Bar handles attorney complaints and, in appropriate cases, will pursue grievances against attorneys. The number is (919) 828-4620. **Note: The law imposes time limits within which you must take certain actions. You therefore should contact an attorney immediately if you have any questions concerning your legal rights and remedies. If your complaint is about a public defender, you should first contact the Public Defender in your district.
How can I take action against a judge that has acted improperly or unethically?
Contact the Judicial Standards Committee. The Commission handles complaints regarding judges and, in appropriate cases, will pursue grievances against judges. The number is (919) 733-2690. The mailing address is Post Office Box 1122, Raleigh, NC 27602. **Note: The law imposes time limits within which you must take certain actions. You therefore should contact an attorney immediately if you have any questions concerning your legal rights and remedies.

Motion to Recuse and Resubmit

Pinellas County Officials Deliberately Engage In Civil Rights Violations

Motion for Reduced Bail

Incompetent And Nefariously Directed Public Defender, Jonathan Duncan Dismissed From Case

As Spencer C. Young was effectively denied legal representation, he filed numerous motions in the 6th Circuit Court of Pinellas County (FL) on his own behalf (i.e., "pro se") in an unwavering effort to secure freedom from his UNLAWFUL arrest and incarceration in MAXIMUM SECURITY JAIL on an entirely FABRICATED charge, after being subjected to FIVE episodes of GRAND LARCENY perpetrated by a profoundly corrupt and unethical North Carolina Judge (David Q. LaBarre) and LaBarre's girlfriend (Leah R. Krier).

The motion to dismiss the demonstrably incompetent Pinellas County public defender assigned (Jonathan Duncan), was the ONLY motion granted throughout this nightmarish ordeal (due to the corruption-laden involvement of an exceptionally dangerous judge (Thomas McGrady) -- This motion is reproduced below and is handwritten because this was the only form of communication allowed Mr. Young during the insidious 127-day incarceration he was maliciously subjected to.

Glaring Display of Incompetence

In a relatively short period of time, Mr. Duncan managed to manifest TWENTY-NINE compelling reasons to remove him as representative legal counsel through glaring errors in judgment, the deliberate withholding of information and in failing to undertake prudent action in response to Mr. Young's unlawful incarceration.  These are detailed in the motion, but warrants summarized delineation:

  1. Failed to provide pre-trial materials
  2. Tried to circumvent a trial-by-jury
  3. Appeared cognitively challenged
  4. Exhibited a troubling level of incompetence
  5. Pre-trial work was lacking
  6. Actions supported a fraudulent extradition
  7. Sixth Amendment rights were being violated
  8. Inability to provide adequate legal assistance
  9. Exhibited legal incompetence
  10. Failed to conduct legal research
  11. Failed to procure protection from violent inmates
  12. Failed to follow up on Criminal Indictment against David Q. LaBarre
  13. Failed to contact the Durham Police and Dept of Justice on LaBarre's Indictment
  14. Failed to obtain a copy of LaBarre's indictment, as directed
  15. Failed to subpoena copies of emails sent containing LaBarre's Indictment
  16. Failed to provide copies of requested documents relevant for securing freedom
  17. Failed to contact the ACLU to request their involvement, as directed
  18. Failed to contact the Amnesty International to request involvement, as directed
  19. Failed to contact the Southern Defense League to request involvement, as directed
  20. Took no action to ensure LaBarre's Indictment was prosecuted
  21. Made no effort to contact Durham DA to prosecute indictment of LaBarre, as directed
  22. Made no effort to contact NC Attorney General to prosecute indictment of LaBarre, as directed
  23. Nonresponsive to requests to review and comment on the false charges
  24. Nonresponsive to the unlawful ransacking of Mr. Young's residence and theft of computers
  25. Nonresponsive to many requests to file motion to set bail
  26. Failed to run a search of all (obviously false) charges against Mr. Young
  27. To no actions whatsoever, nor suggested alternative means of getting the bogus charges against Mr. Young dismissed
  28. Took no actions to protect the well-being, rights and liberty of Mr. Young
  29. Failed to value, nor understand the importance of an innocent man's freedom

Eventually, it became clear Mr. Duncan was party to a malicious scheme to effectively "do nothing" so that Mr. Young's civil rights would be thoroughly trampled upon in this outrageous canard executed in Pinellas County Florida, the purpose of which was to facilitate an FRAUDULENT extradition to North Carolina on entirely fabricated charges intended to cover up the felonies of NC Judge David Q. LaBarre.

Moreover, it became clear Mr. Duncan was acting pursuant to the instructions of his superiors, most notably Pinellas County (FL) Chief Public Defender, Bob Dillinger and Mr. Duncan's immediate supervisor, Jane McNeill, who later played an key role in facilitating the fraudulent extradition.

The chronology of events is rather damning to all involved in this insidious assault on American Civil Liberties.  The below motion was granted on 08/23/12.

Cover-Up Via BASELESS Search & UNLAWFUL Seizure of Computers

The below document is a BOGUS search warrant which was used in an effort to suppress evidence of extensive criminal wrongdoing by corrupt NC Judge David Q. LaBarre and others involved the LaBarre Larceny Scandal, AS WELL AS the surfeit of evidence against Morgan Stanley and its MANY operatives in the omnibus MorganStanleyGate scandal. His long-time friend and equally corrupt Durham NC District Attorney, Leon Stanback orchestrated this canard, and it was an intentional violation of the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution.

As a result, ALL of Spencer C. Young's computers were taken (pictured below) and have NEVER BEEN RETURNED, which is effectively GRAND LARCENY. Additionally, this is a clear cut instance of obstructing justice and a CRIMINAL invasion of privacy hypocritically perpetrated by public officials who are supposed to uphold the law, NOT break it.

The BOGUS Search Warrant

The Corrupt Judge Involved
Philip J. Federico

The judge who played a direct complicit role in this absolutely BASELESS search and seizure was Philip J. Federico, who authorized the above BOGUS search warrant. Worse yet, this blatantly UNLAWFUL act was carried out in an attempt to destroy the evidence of the extensive FELONIES of a North Carolina Judge (David Q. LaBarre), and this judge's girlfriend (Leah R. Krier), who are pictured below holding hands at a romantic dinner together.  Can you believe this reprehensible judge had the audacity to preside over a case involving his girlfriend and proceeded to issue secret orders (referred to as "ex parte" orders) as part of an elaborate series of thefts?

Judge David Q. LaBarre With His Girlfriend Leah R. Krier - Circa Feb. 2011

Motion to Subpoena Documents

This Motion calls for the subpoena of relevant email communications which (1) Prove Spencer C. Young's innocence and (2) Will be used in the prosecution of corrupt NC Judge David LaBarre and others.