Friday, August 23, 2013

Perfect Example Of Corruption-Laden Cover-Up In North Carolina

Here's a lengthy rhetorical two-part question which makes the stifling level of corruption throughout the Triangle Region of North Carolina (Raleigh, Durham & Chapel Hill) plainly obvious because . . .

. . . it is SO utterly preposterous !

Why would ABC News 11 in Raleigh, NC run a story (see video below) about a complaint seeking the removal of Durham District Attorney Leon Stanback for failing to investigate a single event theft of property worth $15,000 perpetrated by an unknown thief and filed by a citizen who states he has only an 8th grade education . . .


. . . yet ignore the sworn affidavit filed and press release issued two weeks later by a graduate-degreed, ivy-league educated former investment banking executive of JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley who founded and built Wall Street franchises that are today worth billions and presents in painstaking detail DA Stanback's abuse of authority and commission of crimes (listed below) . . .

. . . which were carried out to cover-up of felonies perpetrated over six months involving grand larceny, fraudulent conversion and automobile theft of property valued at $275,000, which was masterminded by a corrupt "retired" Durham judge (David Q. LaBarre) and executed by his girlfriend (Leah R. Krier) . . .

. . . and prefaced by "the worst bank foreclosure fraud in U.S. history" involving $22 million in commercial and residential real estate in North Carolina and New York that in turn was carried out to cover up a scandal involving yet-untold banking abuse and $ billions in franchise value with links to:
  • The Sub-Prime Mortgage Market Meltdown in 2008 and ensuing financial crisis now referred to as “The Great Recession”;
  • The Duke Men’s Lacrosse Scandal;
  • The Facebook IPO Fiasco; and 
  • The Occupy (Wall Street) Movement
. . . ALL of which is covered in an upcoming tell-all book titled Cannibals In White Shoes?

Press Release on Filing of Sworn Affidavit to Remove Durham District Attorney Leon Stanback From Office

This press release was issued to virtually every news media outlet in the United States as it is linked to a scandal of national interest.


Author of “Cannibals In White Shoes” 
and Father of Duke Lacrosse Scandal Victim
Files Sworn Affidavit to Remove Durham
District Attorney From Office


Contact: Spencer C. Young –
Durham, NC (August 20, 2013) — Today, Spencer C. Young filed a Sworn Affidavit with the Clerk of Superior Court in Durham County requesting the Court remove District Attorney Leon Stanback from office.  This follows an affidavit similarly seeking Stanback’s removal, which was filed two weeks ago by Durham resident James Michael Lynch (File # 13CVS03898); however, the allegations in the earlier filed complaint pertain to entirely unrelated circumstances.  Mr. Young also concurrently filed multiple criminal charges against Mr. Stanback and others involved in what he describes as a “sordid mess” deliberately orchestrated to obfuscate (i.e. “cover up”) extensive other criminal activities that cross state lines.

About the Claimant
Mr. Young is a graduate-degreed, ivy-league educated former investment banking executive of JPMorgan, where he founded and served as Chief Operating Officer of its Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities (“CMBS”) business, and was an investment banker and Executive Director at Morgan Stanley, where he created the IQ® CMBS franchise.  He is also the author of “Cannibals In White Shoes”, the upcoming hard-hitting exposé of yet untold banking abuse, judicial corruption and outlandish cover-up that followed him from New York to North Carolina, a move made in part to be close to his sons attending Duke University.

This tell-all literary work recounts the experiences of a former Wall Street insider, who later became the target of perverse greed-induced retribution, including victimization in “the worst bank foreclosure fraud in U.S. history”, a distinction readily verified by Google search.  It also details a remarkably orchestrated campaign of corruption-laden activities that boggle the mind, with revelations explosive enough to rock the financial world, while exposing the illicit activities of a disturbing number of wayward professionals in a variety of disciplines.  The collective account of misdeeds are part of a multi-faceted scandal coined “MorganStanleyGate”, which is directly linked to such seminal events as: (1) the Subprime Mortgage Meltdown; (2) the Duke Lacrosse Scandal; (3) the Facebook IPO Fiasco; and (4) the Occupy (Wall Street) Movement. 

This nonfiction account empirically lays out in great detail how all too often it’s those vested with the public’s trust who most abuse their positions of influence by succumbing to bribes, fear-induced threats and other forms of undue avarice-based influence.  As detailed in his affidavit, Mr. Young believes this unsavory group of influentials most certainly includes the current Durham District Attorney, Leon Stanback.

Cannibals In White Shoes is scheduled to be published this Fall, and features chapters that wax eloquent of Mr.Stanback’s misdeeds, which according to Mr. Young, “make those of disgraced predecessor Mike Nifong look like the peccadilloes of a choir boy”.  

And Mr. Young is uniquely qualified to make such a comparative assessment, as his son was on the 2006 Duke Men’s Lacrosse team victimized by Mr. Nifong’s recklessness as Durham’s District Attorney, and then six years later, Mr. Young himself fell victim to yet another dangerously aberrant Durham District Attorney, Leon Stanback.

Additional information about this upcoming literary work can be gleaned in advance of publication by visiting

Lightning Strikes Twice in the Same Place . . . Albeit With A Plot Twist
Roughly six years ago, the Durham District Attorney’s office was awash in scandal a year after it had recklessly pursued the prosecution of innocent young men on the Duke Men’s Lacrosse team, predicated on the allegations of a misguided young woman that were later shown to be bold-faced lies.  Nevertheless, a rush-to-judgment verdict was rendered in the court of public opinion, such that: (1) the 2006 season of this revered #1 nationally ranked collegiate program was cancelled; (2) their immensely talented and storied coach was abruptly fired; and (3) although just three student athletes were indicted, every member of the team was subjected to a palpable “guilt-by-association”, which manifested gratuitous vilification by many in the mainstream media.

Mr. Young’s eldest son Michael and his teammates (as well as their respective families) were subjected to unimaginable emotional distress caused by the reckless overzealous prosecutorial efforts of the now disgraced and disbarred former Durham District Attorney, Mike Nifong.  Moreover, Michael Young’s long-time childhood friend, Collin Finnerty was one of the three young men whose worlds were turned upside when they were wrongfully indicted on false felony charges of assault, kidnapping and rape.  And since Mr. Young had personally known Collin since his grade school days (serving as his CYO basketball coach), he was privy to the devastating impact the bogus indictment had on the entire Finnerty family.

As detailed in Mr. Young’s affidavit, Durham District Attorney Leon Stanback did THE SAME THING as Mike Nifong, and then RAISED THE BAR with profoundly disgraceful behavior, warranting not only Mr. Stanback’s removal and disbarment, but also imprisonment in the North Carolina State Penitentiary.  Mr. Stanback knowingly abused the powers of his office to prosecute charges he KNEW to be FALSE, while deliberately ignoring a series of brazen felonies perpetrated over a six month period by a long-time friend and colleague of his – to wit, Durham Judge David Q. LaBarre and his girlfriend.  In other words, Stanback played a pivotal role, and was knowingly complicit in the cover-up of felonies perpetrated by a public official (LaBarre), with whom he is well-acquainted, and like him is a retired Durham Superior Court Judge and long-time colleague.

The felonies perpetrated by Judge LaBarre and his girlfriend entailed grand larceny, fraudulent conversion and auto theft involving property valued at approximately $275,000, including a Mercedes Benz.  In collusion with Judge LaBarre, DA Stanback then had the victim of these felonies arrested in Florida at gun point by a US Marshal SWAT team, fraudulently extradited, imprisoned in maximum security jail with the most violent of felons, and unlawfully denied bail for 127 days on charges that were literally made up out of thin air.  All told, seventeen Constitutional rights were blatantly violated.  The charges were dismissed as meritless in part because they were predicated on the lies of a similarly misguided young woman, to wit Judge LaBarre’s girlfriend.  Nevertheless, Stanback had this victim convicted in absentia on even more bombastically false misdemeanor charges . . . and he did so after having agreed to similarly dismiss them, as they were certainly baseless.

The victim was Spencer C. Young, and now for the made-for-Hollywood plot twist . . . the misguided young woman behind all the audacious lies is Judge LaBarre’s girlfriend, Leah R. Krier, who had lived with Mr. Young after she was rendered homeless by her previous boyfriend, and after Mr. Young’s marriage of 24 years had succumbed to the unrelenting stress of MorganStanleyGate . . . that is until being evicted by SWAT team in “the worst bank foreclosure fraud in U.S. history”.

[Yes, you read correctly – Mr. Young has been unlawfully assaulted in TWO separate SWAT team attacks of a dozen heavily armed officers – the first time was part of a fraudulent foreclosure on a mortgage that had been PAID-IN-FULL and the second time, the assault was predicated on bold face lies in fabricated charges made in an effort to cover-up the theft of property involuntarily placed in storage as a result of the first SWAT team attack.  Now how can something so outlandishly counter to America values and operative law be allowed to occur?  By undertaking his actions today, Mr. Young is now assuming a leadership role to ensure this NEVER happens again.]

Affidavit Seeks a Called “Strike Three” . . . By An Objective Umpire
Based on his first-hand experience and the extensive empirical evidence that is neatly presented in Cannibals In White Shoes, Mr. Young contends the Triangle Region of North Carolina is afflicted with a stifling level of corruption among its public officials, and that Durham perhaps represents the epicenter of this modern day dystopia, with the Durham’s District Attorney’s Office serving as a prime example.
For instance, the notorious Mike Nifong was removed in humiliation from office in January 2007 (“Strike One!”).  And then Nifong’s successor, Tracey Cline was removed amid more scandal in February 2012 (“Strike Two!”), after she publicly accused Durham Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson of engaging in widespread corruption and abuse of authority.  In response, Ms. Cline was accused of obstructing justice and suppressing evidence that would have exonerated a man she was prosecuting.
Then along comes Leon Stanback, who was appointed after Ms. Cline’s ouster by then North Carolina Governor Bev Perdue.  It is important to note the former Governor Perdue signed the extradition papers that transferred Mr. Young from the Pinellas County Florida Jail to the Durham, North Carolina jail, after having been alerted the arrest was unlawful, and the documents were fraudulent and contradicted operative law.  These bogus documents were authorized by Durham Superior Court Judge, Orlando Hudson, who is the Judge designated to adjudicate affidavits to remove the District Attorney.

Accordingly, Mr. Young’s affidavit seeking removal of Leon Stanback from office (representing “Strike Three!”) requests that Judge Hudson recuse himself, and that the proceedings be overseen by the North Carolina Attorney General, Roy Cooper AND the U.S. Department of Justice because the efforts to cover-up this sordid matter cross state lines, which is covered in the next “plot twist”.

Yet Another Plot Twist
Shortly after Mr. Young publicly announced the upcoming publishing of Cannibals In White Shoes and intentions to seek justice and recover his stolen property (including computers unlawfully seized to suppress the evidence against Judge LaBarre and his girlfriend), he was harassed with an bogus paternity claim emanating from an entirely foreign jurisdiction in a state over a 1,000 miles away, which Mr. Young has only briefly visited but once many years ago. 

The fraudulent demand for payment is also predicated on more bold-faced lies and criminal fraud by Judge LaBarre’s girlfriend – and in this case, the corrupt judge is a rural Kansas district court judge (Ron L. Svaty), who obviously had no jurisdiction whatsoever to render a judgment, and which is in direct violation of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction & Enforcement Act.  And he did so after being provided evidence that: (1) paternity didn’t exist and LaBarre’s girlfriend refused to provide buccal DNA samples; (2) Kansas could not possibly be deemed a “home state”; and (3) he lacked jurisdictional authority in this bogus matter.  Accordingly, multiple ethics complaints have been filed against Judge Svaty with the Kansas Supreme Court’s Judicial Qualifications Commission, Kansas Governor Brownbeck has been alerted and criminal complaints have also been filed with the Kansas Dept. of Justice.

Even more preposterous is that this domicile fraud perpetrated by Judge LaBarre’s girlfriend can be readily exposed by a simple phone call to the human resources department of Air Wisconsin (her employer), who can confirm her residence over the relevant time period has NEVER been in Kansas and ALWAYS in North Carolina.  The “home state” of residency under UCCJEA can also be readily confirmed with the North Carolina Dept. of Motor Vehicles, the North Carolina State Board of Elections, the North Carolina Dept. of Revenue and the US Postal Service.  The absurdity of it all is beyond the pale, as it is effectively using government resources and infrastructure to perpetuate the cover-up of felonies.

The intent of pursuing this bogus claim at this time is obvious – incarcerate Mr. Young for non-payment of a fraudulent child support obligation to a state with no jurisdiction whatsoever, for a child he is not the biological father of, and to a woman who has committed multiple felonies and made off with over $275,000 in property.  The absurdity of it all defies belief, and represents a last ditch effort to stop Cannibals In White Shoes from being published, as $billions in franchise value are at stake, as are the livelihoods of many who have played a complicit role in this mess.

Elephant in the Room
One might logically ask why Judge LaBarre’s girlfriend, who at one time had a close personal relationship with Mr. Young would undertake so many pernicious and fraudulent actions against him and engage in widespread felonies.  As Mr. Young has been precluded from confronting her profound transmogrification in personality, he can only surmise she has been manipulated by unsavory others, who are operating pursuant to a time-tested and empirically refined “divide & conquer” strategy.  Mr. Young is well-acquainted with such diabolical undertakings from his days as an executive at Morgan Stanley, and has seen this employed with other family members, including his wife of 24 years, who was effectively murdered by the resultant stress.

The Claims Against DA Stanback
Under the provisions set forth in NC General Statute §7A-66, which pertains to the removal of district attorneys, Mr. Young’s affidavit charges Mr. Stanback with: (i) willful misconduct in office; (ii) willful and persistent failure to perform his duties; (iii) crimes involving moral turpitude; (iv) conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the office into disrepute; and (v) knowingly authorizing an assistant district attorney to assist in committing such acts.  Any one of these charges, if found to be true, are grounds for removal under North Carolina General Statute (“NCGS”) § 7A – 66.  In his affidavit, Mr. Young cites some of the same allegations filed two weeks ago against Mr. Stanback by Durham resident James Michael Lynch – to wit: (a) failure to investigate and prosecute a grand larceny; and (2) undertaking complicit actions with the intent to cover-up a felony.  This suggests these problems are deep-rooted and systemic within the Durham District Attorney’s office.

Mr. Young said “There can be no faith in our justice system with a district attorney who conspires to engage in criminal fraud that makes a mockery of the U.S. Constitution and assaults the very liberties upon which this nation was founded, and do so with the intent to cover-up multiple felonies perpetrated by another public official.”

According to NCGS §7A-66, once an affidavit is filed, the Clerk of the Superior Court (Archie L. Smith III) is to immediately bring the matter to the attention of the senior resident Superior Court Judge for Durham County, which must NOT be Orlando Hudson for reasons earlier articulated. Within 30 days, the adjudicating Judge should either take action on the charges or refer them for review and action to another Durham County superior court judge.  If the Court finds probable cause, believing the charges are true, Mr. Stanback could be suspended, with pay, pending a final decision in the case.  If the Court finds that grounds for removal exist, the Court would issue an order permanently removing Mr. Stanback from office and terminating his salary – according to Mr. Young, this is an imperative outcome.

Concluding Remarks
Mr. Young offered: “My overriding concern is that Durham County takes steps to immediately remove Leon Stanback, who has proved to be a clear and present danger to society, and finally appoint a competent and ethical district attorney, which this municipality has now failed to accomplish on three consecutive occasions.” 

He went on to say he is also looking for three readily achievable objectives to be attained: (1) void the bogus misdemeanor charges that remain; (2) return ALL stolen property; and (3) prosecute ALL who played a role in this audacious fraud and grand larceny.

In concluding, Mr. Young said: “This sordid mess of profound judicial corruption in North Carolina, Kansas and Florida is predicated on instances of audacious fraud that defy all vestiges of normalcy and common sense.  And it is this level of utter societal dysfunction and perversion of a once respected U.S. judicial system that results from the surreptitious unbridled greed of certain financial institutions . . . and the who, what, where, when, why and how of this is provocatively revealed in Cannibals In White Shoes”. 

Sworn Affidavit Filed to Remove Durham District Attorney From Office

Reflected below is the Sworn Affidavit to Remove Durham District Attorney Leon Stanback From Office Under North Carolina General Statute § 7A – 66.

This affidavit was electronically filed on August 20, 2013, and followed up with the mailing of a notarized original on August 22, 2013.



This request to remove this dangerously corrupt criminal (i.e., Stanback) from office was simply dismissed by another long-time friend and colleague of Mr. Stanback -- to wit, Orlando Hudson, who was ALSO DIRECTLY involved in this dastardly scheme of FALSE ARREST, UNLAWFUL INCARCERATION and FRAUDULENT EXTRADITION of an innocent American citizen (Spencer C. Young) on entirely FABRICATED CHARGES that were DISMISSED AS MERITLESS.  

In fact, it was Orlando Hudson who personally signed off on the documents to what was a patently FRAUDULENT and UNLAWFUL extradition of Mr. Young from Florida to North Carolina.

* * * * * 


COUNTY OF DURHAM FILE NO. ________________ [ To be Assigned ]

IN THE MATTER OF                         ) AFFIDAVIT OF
LEON A. STANBACK                         ) N.C.G.S. 7A-66

Now comes the undersigned, SPENCER C YOUNG (“Complainant”), being first duly sworn, and deposes and says:

1.       I am a resident of Pinellas County, Florida, and formerly resident of Orange County, North Carolina and Nassau County, New York until my family and I were victimized in “the worst bank foreclosure fraud in U.S. history”, a distinction readily corroborated by internet search.  I am also the victim of extensive felonies and numerous civil rights violations perpetrated by Durham District Attorney Leon A. Stanback.  I allege the facts contained herein are true and to which I have personal knowledge.  Instances where allegations are predicated on information and belief are corroborated by overwhelming evidence.

2.       Under the provisions set forth in N.C.G.S. § 7A-66, Removal of District Attorneys, I am requesting the removal of Leon A. Stanback from the office of Durham County District Attorney on the grounds stated herein.

3.       District Attorney Stanback has committed willful misconduct in office, which is grounds for removal from office under N.C.G.S. § 7A-66(2).

4.       District Attorney Stanback has willfully and persistently failed to perform the duties of his office, which is grounds for removal from office under N.C.G.S. § 7A-66(3).

5.       District Attorney Stanback has extensively engaged in crimes involving moral turpitude, contrary to community standards of justice, honesty and generally accepted moral standards, which are so extensive and egregious, his conviction is a fait accompli, and therefore grounds for removal from office under N.C.G.S. § 7A-66(5).
6.       District Attorney Stanback has engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the office into disrepute, which is grounds for removal from office under N.C.G.S. § 7A-66(6).

7.       District Attorney Stanback has knowingly authorized an assistant district attorney to participate in the commission of acts constituting grounds for removal from office from office under N.C.G.S. § 7A-66(7).
8.       District Attorney Stanback failed to carry out the fundamental responsibilities of his office, namely: protecting citizens and their rights, victim advocacy (e.g., recovering stolen property) and prosecuting those who break the law, and he has profoundly failed in the discharge such duties, as detailed herein.

9.       In addition to failing to carry out the core duties of his office, District Attorney Stanback knowingly fulfilled an instrumental role in a nefarious effort to cover-up the criminal activities of fellow "retired" Superior Court Judge, David Q. LaBarre, a long-time friend and colleague of Mr. Stanback's.  He did so by prosecuting charges he knew to be false in a disturbing abuse of authority intended to cover up the felonies of Mr. LaBarre and his girlfriend. Leah R. Krier (pictured below).

10.   Judge David Q. LaBarre and his girlfriend perpetrated a series of felonies over a six month period  (March 2011 to September 2011) which was detailed in a 30 page indictment/complaint electronically filed with the Durham Police Dept. on July 2, 2012, which in turn included hyperlinks to overwhelming evidence of their felonies – this document is incorporated by reference and can be accessed by CLICKING HERE. 
11.   Ms. Krier confessed to the theft of over $200,000 fair value of Complainant’s home furnishings that were involuntarily placed into storage from the aforesaid foreclosure fraud, and directly participated in the fraudulent conversion and eventual theft of Complainant’s Mercedes Benz S320 (pictured below), which was masterminded by Judge LaBarre.  This grand larceny resulted in a fraudulent transfer of title into the name of one of Ms. Krier’s friends (William Douglas Johnson), who in turn has allowed Ms. Krier to drive this car, as if she owned it.  This admission of guilt was made by Ms. Krier to Assistant DA, Kelly Gauger, who upon information and belief took no action, pursuant the directives of DA Stanback;
12.   In lieu of prosecuting the felonies perpetrated by Mr. LaBarre and his girlfriend (captured on security video), Mr. Stanback colluded in the prosecution of false charges against the victim of their thefts (i.e., Complainant) and in an egregious abuse of authority, arrested Complainant at his residence in Florida via heavily armed SWAT team of U.S. Marshals.  Complainant was then extradited, tortured, incarcerated in maximum security jail, unlawfully denied bail for 127 days, and denied competent legal representation.
13.   During Complainant’s wrongful incarceration, District Attorney Stanback arranged the unlawful seizure of Complainant’s computers from his Florida residence (see below) with the intent to suppress the damning evidence against LaBarre and his girlfriend, which as of this filing have still not been returned.

14.   All told, seventeen of Complainant’s Constitutional rights were violated from the reckless and unlawful actions of District Attorney Stanback.  The below handwritten excerpts were compiled while he was unlawfully incarcerated in maximum security jail on false charges that were later dismissed as meritless.

15.   The prosecutorial actions of the District Attorney Stanback in this matter paralleled those of disgraced former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong in the infamous Duke Lacrosse Case and ensuing scandal, as if it were an instance of déjà vu, in that:

a.       It is now a well-known fact that the Durham District Attorney (Mr. Nifong) had recklessly and overzealously prosecuted false charges made by a misguided young woman, Crystal Mangum, and incited a scandal of epic proportion and brought shame to Durham; nevertheless . . .
b.       Six years later, Durham District Attorney Leon Stanback recklessly prosecuted charges he knew to be false, which were similarly made by a misguided young woman, Leah R. Krier (who was also romantically involved with Mr. Stanback’s friend and colleague, Durham “Emergency” Judge David Q. LaBarre), in an effort to cover-up  the felonies she and Mr. LaBarre perpetrated; 
c.       Complainant’s eldest son (Michael Young) was victimized by Mr. Nifong's recklessness as a member of the 2006 Duke Men's Lacrosse team – for the entire team of innocent student-athletes were vilified in the media and subjected to frequent death threats, while their coach was wrongfully fired and their season was cancelled – and Mr. Nifong aggressively pursued indictments against three student-athletes whom he knew to be innocent, one of whom was my son’s best friend (Collin Finnerty), and yet . . . 
d.       Six years after the Duke Lacrosse team’s victimization from the disgraceful acts of Durham’s District Attorney, the Complainant was similarly indicted on entirely fabricated charges comprised of bold-faced lies, which were again recklessly pursued by Durham’s District Attorney, albeit this time it was Leon Stanback, who has again brought shame to Durham.
16.   After the fraudulent nature of the charges against Complainant became obvious and the substantial damages had been done, District Attorney Stanback failed to carry out three simple objectives to ameliorate this horrible situation.  In reckless disregard of his duties and in violation of the U.S. Constitution and operative law, he failed to: (1) dismiss ALL false charges against Complainant; (2) return ALL property stolen by Mr. LaBarre and his girlfriend, including all computers wrongfully seized; and (3) prosecute the thieves and liars responsible for this reprehensible criminal fraud. 
17.   District Attorney Stanback's abuse of prosecutorial authority and reckless behavior in the “LaBarre Larceny Scandal” has been far worse than that demonstrated by Mike Nifong in the “Duke Lacrosse Scandal” because Mr. Stanback . . .
a.       Prosecuted charges against Complainant, which he knew to be false, with the intent to aid and abet the felonies perpetrated by LaBarre, Krier and others;
b.       Arrested Complainant via SWAT team on false charges and unlawfully jailed him without bail;
c.       Prepared perjured extradition documents for signature by then Gov. Bev Perdue;
d.       Pursued Complainant's extradition to NC, which he knew to be fatally defective;
e.       Executed the wrongful seizure of Complainant's computers in a malicious and unlawful effort to suppress evidence against his friend, Mr. LaBarre and his girlfriend;
f.        Failed to drop the charges against Complainant after Ms. Krier had confessed to the thefts and to having possession of his stolen property;
g.       Failed to recover and return Complainant's stolen property;
h.       Ignored the criminal indictment filed against LaBarre, despite there being overwhelming evidence of Grand Larceny, Fraudulent Conversion & AutoTheft, as well as abuse of judicial authority;
i.        Undertook other illicit actions with the express intent to cover-up the felonies of his friend unsavory complicit others; and
j.        Deliberately wasted hundreds of thousands in taxpayer dollars in an elaborate and vicious assault on American civil liberties, as outlined below.

18.   In the Duke Lacrosse Scandal, three student-athletes were wrongfully indicted and arrested on false charges.  For purposes of this comparative analysis, it is important to keep in mind they spent no time in jail, as they were comfortably availed advanced notice, and were allowed to voluntarily surrender and immediately post bail, all of which were coordinated with their respective criminal defense attorneys.  By comparison, Complainant (who has no criminal record) was:
a.       Violently arrested without warning by a US Marshal SWAT team
b.       Stripped searched and detained in a holding cell with violent felons
c.       Not provided any details of the charges against him for 3 months
d.       Denied access to an attorney
e.       Denied the opportunity to post bail for 127 days
f.        Prevented from making phone calls to family members or friends
g.       Placed in solitary confinement for mentally disturbed inmates
h.       Later transferred into "maximum security" with the most violent felons
i.        Regularly subjected to physical threats by severely deranged inmates
j.        Psychologically tortured (e.g. denied privileges for pretended offenses)
k.       Physically tortured (e.g. denied medical treatment for a broken bone)
l.        Subjected to ongoing emotional trauma via intentional sleep deprivation
m.     Extradited over two days in an over-crowded van with hands & legs shackled
n.       Often denied personal hygiene privileges; and
o.       Administered drugs to dangerously elevate his blood pressure

19.   District Attorney Stanback knowingly intended to cover up the crimes of Mr. LaBarre and others:
20.   As a result of District Attorney Stanback’s reckless actions, he has committed the following crimes:
21.   In further support of the aforesaid allegations, the following web-links are hereby incorporated by reference and provide additional overwhelming corroborative evidence, and note that each of these website links have links to additional supporting information:
a.       Criminal charges filed against LaBarre and his girlfriend which District Attorney Stanback failed to act on and sought to cover up
b.       Property stolen by LaBarre and his girlfriend, which District Attorney Stanback has failed in his duties to return to Complainant, its rightful owner
c.       Summary of the criminal cover-up and related corruption in this matter, including extensive unlawful tampering with the public defender process –
d.       Details of the “worst bank foreclosure fraud in U.S. history”, the prefacing unlawful event which District Attorney Stanback’s illicit acts are also intended to cover up –
e.       Particularization of the 17 Constitutional rights violations which District Attorney Stanback was instrumental in causing 
f.        Parallels with the Duke Lacrosse Scandal and District Attorney Stanback being put on notice to his criminal acts, for which he must be held accountable –
g.       District Attorney Stanback’s disgraceful behavior put into historical context –

District Attorney Stanback recklessly abused his prosecutorial authority with the express intent to
cover-up the felonies of Durham Judge David Q. LaBarre and his girlfriend, Leah R. Krier through the deliberate execution of an unlawful arrest of an innocent U.S. citizen (i.e., Complainant), who was in turn the felony victim of Mr. LaBarre and his girlfriend and thereby fulfilled an instrumental role in a vicious assault on American civil liberties and is therefore complicit in those felonies. 

Mr. Stanback’s actions constitute: (i) willful misconduct in office; (ii) willful and persistent failure to perform his duties; (iii) crimes involving moral turpitude; (iv) conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the office into disrepute; and (v) knowingly authorizing an assistant district attorney to assist in committing such acts – and each such action is grounds for removal. 

This is my sworn affidavit to remove Durham District Attorney Leon Stanback from office pursuant to North Carolina General Statute § 7A – 66, and I further request that that he and others culpable in the unlawful acts described herein be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. 

I further request that Durham Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson recuse himself or otherwise be precluded from adjudicating this matter, as he authorized and signed off on extradition documents that were proven to be fraudulent, and he is therefore implicated in the unlawful activities described herein.  Moreover, as extensive instances of corruption in Durham have been personally observed, request is additionally made to have these proceedings overseen by North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper and the U.S. Department of Justice.

Respectfully submitted,

Spencer C. Young
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby affirm that Spencer C. Young personally appeared before me on the 22nd day of AUGUST 2013, and signed the above Affidavit as his free and voluntary act and deed.