The below was emailed to Lawrence Campbell and Antoinette Hilliard of the Public Defender's Office of Durham County requesting the DISMISSAL of Mr. Young's FOURTH assigned Public Defender (Janet J. Lennon), the absurdity of which is beyond the pale.
 |
| Campbell Hilliard Lennon LaBarre Krier |
Ms. Lennon (who may not in fact exist) was assigned to defend Spencer C. Young against the 100% FALSE charges, which were initiated by the woefully corrupt Judge David Q. LaBarre and Leah R. Krier, who have been romantically involved with each other since late 2010 (pictured below). And what makes this especially reprehensible and outright EVIL is that this FRAUD was perpetrated to cover up their own FELONIES.
 |
Leah R. Krier and Judge David Q. LaBarre holding hands at a romantic dinner before their
collaborated crime spree of Grand Larceny, Fraudulent Conversion & Auto Theft |
______________________
Date: January 5, 2013
To: Lawrence M. Campbell – Chief Public
Defender of Durham County
Antoinette Hilliard – Durham County
Office of the Public Defender
Cc: Mainstream News Media
Federal & State Law Enforcement
Subject: Janet J. Lennon Represents “Stee-rike Four!!”
As Pubic Defender
In America’s national pastime, when at
bat, you get three strikes and you’re out.
Yet metaphorically, your assigning Janet J. Lennon to defend me against the
FALSE charges that should have been DISMISSED long ago now represents “strike four”!!
 |
| The Mighty Casey Struck Out After THREE Strikes |
Prior Failures And in the context of three prior
“whiffs”, this situation is NOT a coincidence, but rather part of efforts to
cover up the criminal wrongdoings of an exceptionally corrupt Durham County
Judge David Q. LaBarre (click here for details). As you know, the
three prior “strikes” were:
- John R. Griffin of Griffin
& Frasier
– He was assigned to defend me against the BOGUS felony “extortion” charge;
however, he failed to respond to any of my phone calls and emails. When he finally called weeks later and on the
eve of my first hearing, he was oddly combative, as if reading from a script. It was Kimberly Lott who first suggested he
be replaced. (Click here for a summary of Mr. Griffin’s atrocious behavior.)
- Kimberly Lott of Stewman & Booker – She was precluded from
representing me on the extortion charge because this 41-year-old had just
graduated law school only months earlier, and therefore relegated (by NC court
rules) to only defend me against the equally CONCOCTED misdemeanor charges of
cyberstalking and harassing phone calls.
Although she expressed outrage at Judge LaBarre’s behavior, and vowed to
help bring my three primary objectives (listed below) to fruition, she confided
she was harshly admonished and could do nothing because she “had to work with
these people”. As a result, she accomplished
nothing and became similarly unresponsive. When confronted with having to explain a dozen
long outstanding deliverables, she resigned.
- Brian Aus of Shella,
Harris & Aus – With the exception of my first call, Brian has NEVER returned my phone
calls and he has failed to respond to emails dating back to four weeks
ago. Moreover, he has deliberately
withheld “discovery documents” he received on 12/6/2012, and then LIED to a
court clerk who called on my behalf (as he was unresponsive to my calls and
emails), indicating that he mailed it to me, but I had rejected it. He’s refused to provide any tracking numbers,
nor resign representation.
(Click here for a listing of the confounding behaviors of Brian Aus & Kimberly Lott.)
Strike Four
After being notified of Ms. Lennon’s
appointment via email on Jan. 2, 2013, I gave her an opportunity to call before
placing a call into her at the end of the day.
She also did not return my call on Jan. 3 & 4. In the meantime, I researched Ms. Lennon’s
background, and had to employ the use of over 20 separate Internet search
engines, because my searches resulted in remarkably little substantive
information, as though she really hasn’t existed much during her 58 years of
life.
Notwithstanding, from that which I
was able to glean, it is clear Janet J. Lennon is unskilled, ill-suited and not
competent to fulfill the role of criminal defense attorney in defending me against
entirely FALSE charges, which are the byproduct of the profound level of
judicial, legal and law enforcement corruption.
She is however, an ideal choice to facilitate the FRAUDULENT prosecution
of an INNOCENT VICTIM of GRAND LARCENY to cover-up the CRIMES of Judge
LaBarre. This is because she: (1)
thoroughly lacks criminal defense experience (2) has effectively covered up any
information about her; and (3) has an extensive background as senior legal
advisor within the New York Police Department during a time when corruption was
rampant (refer to the section below titled “Fox Guarding The Hen House”).
What’s Really Going On
As you know, BOGUS charges were brought against me
IMMEDIATELY AFTER I exposed the criminal wrongdoings of Durham County Judge David
Q LaBarre, and my UNLAWFUL arrest in Florida by a SWAT team of U.S. Marshals
THE DAY AFTER I filed the detailed criminal indictment of this corrupt judge
is NOT a coincidence. And my being
UNLAWFULLY held without bail for 127 days, placed in maximum security jail with
the most violent felons, and then regularly subjected to psychological torture
in solitary confinement is INEXCUSABLE. Moreover,
the ensuing ransacking of my Florida residence and WRONGFUL SEIZURE of all of
my computer equipment was a further assault on my rights and desperate attempt
to suppress the damning evidence against Judge LaBarre and others.
What’s really going on is this . .
. An innocent law abiding citizen with
no criminal record who was victimized in the theft of roughly $200,000 of his
personal belongings, which was masterminded by a judge as a sophisticated form
of payment for prostitution services, which is revealed in the accompanying
Exhibit 1. So the real perversion is really quite simple:
The VICTIM of a THEFT is
being prosecuted
instead of the CRIMINAL THIEVES responsible
The Elephant In The
Room
So with regard to the criminal charges filed against Judge
LaBarre and his many accomplices on July 2, 2012, the logical question is
this:
“Why has this still not been prosecuted?”
Fox Guarding The Henhouse
As noted below, Ms. Lennon’s background has been focused on
prosecution and in providing legal advice to senior New York City Police
officials. This background represents
the antithesis of skill sets necessary for the defense of the FALSE criminal
charges.
A Riddle Wrapped in a
Mystery Inside an Enigma
Reflected below are screenshots of some example internet
search results conducted on Janet J. Lennon and bring to mind the famous
Winston Churchill quote used as the title of this section. I believe it’s fair to say after running
these inquiries, I have no idea who this person is, and raises some doubts as
to whether this person really exists. As
noted below, there are no plan reviews nor peer endorsements.
In most instances, one can rarely get more than a name
address and phone number. . .
. . . And concerning
her legal expertise, little more is divulged than having a law license and
being a member of the North Carolina State Bar. . .
. . . And in today’s 21st century
Internet age, is beyond mysterious that as a sole practitioner, Ms. Lennon does
NOT have a website.
. . . And it is exceptionally strange that her lawyer profile on Martindale.com receives the top 6% to 9% of viewership traffic, while specific search engines used to hire an attorney, indicate that she does not exist.
And in trying to run a search on cases she has handled, one
comes away with the feeling that she’s handled very few cases, where the
details have been purged . . .
. . . and in those rare instances that reveals her
involvement in a case, it has nothing to do with criminal defense, and it’s a
case she ended up losing (see next page). . .
Concluding Remarks
In closing, I hope your actions in promptly selecting
a fifth (and hopefully final) public defender will demonstrate integrity in the
discharge of your responsibilities, and confirm that you are NOT involved in
the aforementioned sinister cover-up.
This person should embrace and be willing to undertake meaningful actions
to achieve the following THREE objectives:
- Dismiss all charges
against me
- Secure the return of
my stolen property (including wrongfully seized computers); and
- Prosecute my criminal
complaint filed on July 2, 2012
Sincerely,
Spencer C.
Young
