The excerpt below is Exhibit XII - Evidence Supporting Each of the TWENTY Elements of Fraud from the Jan. 29, 2010 Notice sent to Senior officials for North Carolina and the Federal government on a mortgage that was:
- ALWAYS paid before the monthly due date
- NEVER delinquent
- NEVER in default
- And on the day of eviction PAID-IN-FULL !!
In the last phase of the Worst Bank Foreclosure Fraud in U.S. History, which was carried out by Paragon Commercial Bank and Poyner & Spruill, there were TWENTY elements of FRAUD committed by the Perpetrators, and this Exhibit contains the “smoking gun” evidence of each Element of FRAUD.
Keep in mind the following: The Jan. 29, 2010 Notice filed with Senior officials for North Carolina and the Federal government contained an explanation of each of the TWENTY elements of Fraud, which factored into the 31-count indictment, which was also included in the Jan. 29 Notice.
# # # # #
The 20 Elements of Fraud Were Perpetrated By . . .
. . . At the behest of . . .
. . . to cover-up the FRESCA crimes of MorganStanleyGate
Note: To Access the Smoking Gun Evidence, Click On Each Of TWENTY Hyper-Linked Fraud Elements Listed in the table below:
#
|
Fraud Element
|
Evidentiary Documents
|
Pages
|
1
|
These documents show Paragon’s actions to be baseless and intended to orchestrate a default.
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #1] |
|
1-2
|
|
3-17
| ||
|
18
| ||
|
19
| ||
|
20
| ||
2
|
These documents show Paragon fraudulently fabricated the illusion of a default
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #2] |
|
1
|
|
2-3
| ||
|
4
| ||
|
5-7
| ||
3
|
These documents show Paragon had ignored specific instructions to keep all loans current
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #3] |
A. 2/10/09 email from SYoung to CHorton titled: Paragon’s ACH Debacle;
|
1
|
B. 2/10/09 email from SYoung to JHoose titled Your Intentions are Fraudulent & Malicious
|
2-3
| ||
C. 2/11/09 memo from SYoung to BHatley that the ACH deposits NOT be reversed
|
4
| ||
D. 2/27/09 Paragon Bank Statement for Spencer C. Young Investments, Inc.
|
5-7
| ||
4
|
In the context of the preceding evidence, these documents show that the Notice of Default was based entirely on the orchestrated Fraud perpetrated by Paragon
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #4] |
|
1
|
|
2
| ||
|
3
| ||
|
4
| ||
|
5
| ||
5
|
Since the loan accelerations were based on entirely fabricated, and therefore Fraudulent defaults, the demands for payment in full were without merit, and maliciously intended
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #5] |
|
1-2
|
|
3
| ||
|
4-5
| ||
|
6-7
| ||
|
8-9
| ||
|
10
| ||
6
|
The subject loans were NOT in default, so he exercise an assignment of rents was a FRAUD, and intended to cause emotional distress
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #6] |
|
1
|
|
2
| ||
|
3-4
| ||
|
5-6
| ||
|
7-11
| ||
7
|
These are the documents that were hand delivered by Jim Hoose of Paragon to Mr. Young’s commercial tenants, which caused consternation, confusion and uncertainty, thereby disrupting commerce at the subject property
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #7] |
|
1
|
|
2
| ||
|
3
| ||
|
4
| ||
|
5
| ||
|
6
| ||
|
7
| ||
|
8
| ||
|
9
| ||
8
|
These documents portrayed Mr. Young as financially irresponsible and threatened each tenant
|
|
1
|
|
2
| ||
9
|
These documents show the leasing Paragon’s malicious fraud undermined. The net effect was a loss of rental income totaling $263,000, whose revenue stream represented an incremental value ranging from $3.3 million and $3.5 million
|
|
1-6
|
|
7-16
| ||
|
17-20
| ||
|
21-31
| ||
|
32-41
| ||
|
42-83
| ||
|
84
| ||
|
85
| ||
|
86-98
| ||
|
99-112
| ||
|
113-126
| ||
|
127-171
| ||
|
172
| ||
10
|
This document reflects Paragon’s abrupt closure of Mr. Young’s deposit accounts in support of their FRAUD
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #10] |
|
1
|
11
|
These documents show Paragon’s absconding with the funds in Mr. Young’s deposit accounts, constituting criminal felonies of embezzlement and grand larceny
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #11] |
|
1
|
|
2-3
| ||
|
4
| ||
|
5
| ||
12
|
This document is self-explanatory
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #12] |
|
1
|
13
|
These documents show the extensive level of corruption employed to prevent Mr. Young from engaging local real estate counsel, thereby paving the way for Paragon to proceed with their FRAUD-based foreclosures uncontested.
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #13] |
|
1-68
|
|
69
| ||
|
70
| ||
|
71-90
| ||
|
91-93
| ||
|
94-96
| ||
14
|
These documents describe and evidence the extensive and completely unnecessary use of the Orange County Sheriff to intimidate Mr. Young
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #14] |
|
1
|
|
2
| ||
|
3-5
| ||
15
|
These documents show how Paragon and Poyner & Spruill collaborated with judges to accelerate the appointment of a Receiver without ever having to prove there was in fact a default on the subject notes while denying Mr. Young from presenting evidence that show all proceedings to be a FRAUD.
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #15] |
|
1-12
|
|
13-18
| ||
|
19
| ||
|
20-22
| ||
|
23-25
| ||
|
26-29
| ||
16
|
These documents show requests were made for time to engage legal counsel – these were denied or granted for such a significantly shortened period that it had essentially the same effect as a denial
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #16] |
|
1
|
|
2
| ||
|
3
| ||
|
4
| ||
17
|
The documents pertain to a series of court proceedings where Paragon did not have to prove there were in fact monetary defaults on all four loans, other than to submit an affidavit by one of the Primary Perpetrators of this audacious FRAD – to wit, James Hoose. And Mr. Young was prevented from presenting the overwhelming evidence that showed the Defaults to ALL be FRAUDULENT.
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #17] |
|
1-2
|
|
3-4
| ||
|
5
| ||
|
6-10
| ||
|
11-14
| ||
|
15-18
| ||
|
19-27
| ||
18
|
These documents reflect many of the hearings and proceedings that were aggressively moved forward uncontested because Mr. Young was blocked from hiring legal counsel, and therefore unable to present overwhelming evidence of Paragon’s FRAUD
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #18] |
|
1-8
|
|
9
| ||
|
10-17
| ||
|
18-25
| ||
|
26-29
| ||
|
30
| ||
|
31-32
| ||
|
33-34
| ||
19
|
These documents reflect the substantial amount of grand larceny perpetrated against Mr. Young – the intent being to wipe him out so he will not be able to pursue his substantial civil claims, and lead the prosecution effort.
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #19] |
|
1
|
|
2
| ||
|
3
| ||
|
4
| ||
20
|
These documents reveal Paragon’s malicious intent for in creating stress and homelessness to Mr. Young’s 83 yr old mother and 53 yr old ex-wife, who have a heart condition and cancer, respectively they have sought to hasten their death.
[Click Here for the Blog Post And Explanation of this Fraud Element #20] |
|
1-2
|
|
3
| ||
|
4-5
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.